pulse-rt by default?

[Callum Lerwick]

On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 20:29 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can I suggest that we consider adding new desktop users on a fresh
> install to pulse-rt by default? Or, put another way, does anyone think
> this is a particularly bad idea to be doing?

Seems kind of pointless. If you're running low on CPU time, giving
pulseaudio priority will likely just result in client buffers running
dry anyway. Is there anything in place to take care of the priority
inversion problem? I know jackd/jacklib has some scheduling magic in
it...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081005/6353d645/attachment.sig>