Status of libtool 2.2.X?

[Callum Lerwick]

On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 11:31 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> If the state of the art has advanced and there's a tool that can
> replace libtool so a developer can say "I want a shared library" and the
> tool builds it on all platforms then we could look into getting
> upstreams to switch but simply getting rid of libtool in favour of
> handcoding Makefiles to build shared libraries is a step in the wrong
> direction.

CMake! Catch the wave!

http://www.cmake.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081010/d678723a/attachment.sig>