yafray "renamed" to yafaray - pick it ?

[KH KH]

2008/10/13 Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> As announced at http://www.yafray.org, yafaray replaces YafRay 0.0.9.
>> Thus I'm thinking of submitting yafray as dead.package in Rawhide. (1)
>>
>> On the other side, I'm not going to work on yafaray soon. So, if anyone
>> wants to start working on it, feel free.
>>
>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>>
>>
>> (1), There is no reason why yafray should stop working with the current
>> blender releases. But there might be a problem when theses two are
>> installed together. (until now, blender either dlopen library or call
>> binary, from yafray).
>> This has to be discussed in the yafaray review. So, please cc'ed me on
>> the review, along with your favorite reviewer. (or ask me as a reviewer).
>
> I may just do that.  One thing though, am I blind or is there nor yafaray
> tarball, and I'll have to work from a svn checkout?  (bleah)
Yes, that's right.
I think it will be appropriate to use a script to create one source tarball.
Good luck !

Nicolas (kwizart)
>>
>> --
>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>
>
>
> --
> novus ordo absurdum
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>