reviving Fedora Legacy
Till Maas
opensource at till.name
Wed Oct 15 16:51:33 UTC 2008
On Wed October 15 2008, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > On Wed October 15 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> (And bug reports, blah blah blah.)
> >
> > If the ACLs for the EOL releases are cleared, the maintainers of the
> > supported packages will not get any bug reports (unless Bugzilla does not
> > support this of course). Also the EOL-team can triage the bugs for the
> > supported release to avoid bugging the maintainers.
>
> I think we're stretching beyond bugzilla's capabilities but I'd be happy
> to be proved wrong :-)
>
> I don't think bugzilla has separation of Product-versions so there's no
> way to assign different people to Fedora-10 and Fedora-7.
I always feared this. In case this is true and initialCC cannot be configured
differently for different Fedora versions, too, (which I assume is
unrealistic if bugzilla cannot distinguish versions for assignees) imho the
packageDB UI should reflect this.
Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081015/040d1b5c/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list