[Fwd: Wikipidia - Goodbye Red Hat and Fedora]

[Patrice Dumas]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:30:34PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> 
> If all that is "maintained" is a skeleton system, that won't do much good
> (how often was a /@core/ or /@base/ packages that can't be upgraded the
> cause of not moving to the next Fedora?)

This is not the goal. Hopefully there will be much more maintained
packages (and given that some people seem to be interested and they
maintain or co-maintain a large number of packages) but this is to
define a minimal set of packages that are mandatorily actively 
maintained.

--
Pat