review-o-matic : Fedora package review helper

Patrice Dumas pertusus at free.fr
Fri Oct 17 17:03:51 UTC 2008


On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:27:35AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> 
> It would be great if some effort could also be spent extending rpmlint 
> itself to handle most of these things.  Why implement a new tool when 
> we have one already?
> 
> Furthermore, since the Packaging Guidelines can change, it would help 
> if they were versioned in some way so that rpmlint could refer to 
> which version of the guidelines it is following.

Unless I am wrong, rpmlint is not a checked for fedora package
guidelines, it is distribution agnostic, simply a tool for checking
common errors in rpm packages.

--
Pat




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list