yafray "renamed" to yafaray - pick it ?

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:19 AM, KH KH <kwizart at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2008/10/19 Paulo Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com>:
>
> >
> > Well, I fixed it:
> >
> > http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm<http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm>
> >
> > It builds just fine in F9 now.
> >
> > I hope it can help you.
> Hi Paulo!
>
> I think this package should follow the usual package review process now.
> It would be fine to close this topic, here on the mailing list, with
> the bugzilla review request;
> then, anyone can follow the conversation on the review.
> But I think yafray and yafaray should co-exist for now.
>
> Now, you will need to get sponsored for the package to be.
> In the yafaray case, I would like to review it , as there is some
> improvements required.
> But your spec should be a good start.
>
>
Hi,

in fact, according to my tests, yafray and yafaray can coexist. They use
different Blender menus.

However, yafaray needs to be integrated into blender. To accomplish this,
there is a new rpm,
yafaray-blender, that copies the appropriate scripts and libraries to
/usr/share/blender/scripts.

http://www.yafray.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1701

This additional rpm is created automatically within the new yafaray
.src.rpm:

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm

This new .src.rpm builds fine with mock for F8 and F9.

It would be really nice to have yafaray in Fedora, maybe for F10, since
Ubuntu already has it:

http://www.yafray.org/index.php?s=2

If you can review the package it will be good, but I think we need some
blender users to make
a thorough evaluation.

Thanks.

-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081019/3412a6af/attachment.htm>