rawhide report: 20081004 changes

David Timms dtimms at iinet.net.au
Sun Oct 5 13:28:23 UTC 2008


Alex Lancaster wrote:
> [...]
> 
> Trying to do a quick audit/triage of the remaining broken deps (some
> of which have lingered for >2 months!  (I will also repeat my request
> to move the "broken deps" section to the top of the rawhide report so
> that it gets more regular attention from all developers).
I think it would simplify the report if each package was mentioned just 
once, with a leader or trailer stating the arch(s) that it failed on. 
This assists to quickly determine if the issue is likely to be arch 
specific, or cross platform. What do you think ?

DaveT.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list