trash-cli : Looking for a reviewer
Behdad Esfahbod
behdad at behdad.org
Sun Oct 5 21:38:10 UTC 2008
Andrea Francia wrote:
> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>> Jean-François Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Le dimanche 05 octobre 2008 à 01:36 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:10:06AM +0200, Jean-François Martin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Patrice Dumas had already done a partial review but don't want to
>>>>> accept
>>>>> the package because he think that executables are too generic (trash,
>>>>> empty-trash, list-trash, restore-trash).
>>>>>
>>>> There is only trash that I find too generic...
>>>>
>>> If this command is really a problem can't we rename it "to-trash" for
>>> example and add a file in doc, README.fedora that tell that for
>>> packaging policy, we decide to change this command?
>>>
>>
>> If renaming, please consider renaming them all to trash-* from the
>> current
>> *-trash.
>>
> What are the advantages of doing this?
Eh, thought it's obvious. One can type "trash" then use tab completion to see
what commands are available. For example when I install a package, say
bittorrent, I naturally try "bittorrent<TAB><TAB>" before having to fall back
to "rpm -ql bittorrent". It's simple namespacing too.
behdad
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list