Proposed discussion point (Re: Plan for tomorrows (20081008) FESCO meeting)

[Brian Pepple]

On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 20:07 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 07.10.2008 18:12, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > You want something to be discussed? Send a note to the list in reply to
> > this mail and I'll add it to the schedule.  You can also propose topics
> > in the meeting while it is in the "Free discussion around Fedora" phase.
> 
> Seems we are about to get proper suppose for comps.xml in PK sooner or 
> later; for details see
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg00381.html
> 
> Which brings us back to the following mail from last month (which 
> resulted in a long discussion that afaics indirectly was one of the 
> reasons for the new PK enhancements we'll get...)
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg01813.html
> 
> The main two questions, where I'd really like to see advice from FESCo 
> (or whatever committee feels responsible for this kind of task) how to 
> move on:
> 
> - Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not? (¹)
> 
> - How do we make packagers add all their packages to comps.xml?

Added to the schedule.  Thanks.

Later,
/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081007/22917b3a/attachment.sig>