[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Disappointed: My feature was removed without noticing me
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Disappointed: My feature was removed without noticing me
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:38:52 -0400
Kevin Kofler (kevin kofler chello at) said:
> Bill Nottingham <notting <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > There are descriptions which are translated as well....
>
> Well, leave it blank, leave it in English (untranslated), put just a URL for
> the upstream web page as the description
... or, actually follow the string freeze, and the string freeze break
policy.
> too, ... - anything is better than having a set of packages all packaged and
> reviewed, but hidden from users (not listed in comps, and rejected as a feature
> on the ground that it isn't in comps).
I'm sorry, but I'm missing the outrage - the feature page listed the
following things, under 'Scope':
* Package Reviews (were not fully done)
* Comps: new group with id "lxde-desktop", name "LXDE"...
o mandatory: lxde-common, lxpanel, openbox, pcmanfm
o default: gpicview, leafpad, lxappearance, lxtask, lxterminal, obconf, xarchiver
... (wasn't done)
and, under 'Test Plan':
As most of the packages are already in fedora they are proven to be stable. So we need to
1. get the 2 missing packages into rawhide ASAP so they are included in the F10 Beta
2. add packages to comps
3. test that installation with yum-groupinstall works correctly
4. test fresh installs with the beta
It wasn't even to having step 1 completed. So, exactly what else is there to
do when even the basic scope and test plan of the feature isn't ready?
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]