CMake!
Lennart Poettering
mzerqung at 0pointer.de
Fri Oct 10 23:20:42 UTC 2008
On Fri, 10.10.08 22:39, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler at chello.at) wrote:
> > > If you want upstream to stop using libtool altogether, find a
> > > suitable replacement and convince the Automake developers to use
> > > it instead.
> >
> > Why the h8? He was speaking in the context of "the state of the
> > art" and in my oh-so-humble opinion CMake is it. The whole of the
> > Autotools stack is very much... not.
>
> +1
>
> The suggestion to convince the automake developers to use something
> other than libtool is pointless, because automake should also go
> away, it's at least as obsolete, buggy, unable to maintain backwards
> compatibility, annoying, a massive time waster at build time and a
> major PITA for developers to code with as libtool is. The whole
> autotools stack sucks. It always did, we just didn't have anything
> better. We now do, so why are people still using autotools?
I actually like autotools.
Oh, and I think that cmake is a big trainwreck.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list