reviving Fedora Legacy

Patrice Dumas pertusus at free.fr
Sun Oct 12 22:26:13 UTC 2008


On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:01:53AM +0200, shmuel siegel wrote:
>>   
> Up to here you definitely had my sympathy. But this anarchical approach  
> makes me wonder who your target audience is. I would think that the  
> majority of people who wouldn't want to upgrade to an official Fedora  
> release would be people who need stability. Fedora itself  is probably a  
> little bit too unstable for them. These people would probably want more  
> than the average level of QA. To borrow a phrasing from Jef, legacy  
> updates should be edible by babies.

More QA in EOL than in release doesn't make sense. This 'anarchical'
approach is not very anarchical given what kind of changes are allowed.

--
Pat




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list