reviving Fedora Legacy
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Sun Oct 12 22:26:13 UTC 2008
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:01:53AM +0200, shmuel siegel wrote:
>>
> Up to here you definitely had my sympathy. But this anarchical approach
> makes me wonder who your target audience is. I would think that the
> majority of people who wouldn't want to upgrade to an official Fedora
> release would be people who need stability. Fedora itself is probably a
> little bit too unstable for them. These people would probably want more
> than the average level of QA. To borrow a phrasing from Jef, legacy
> updates should be edible by babies.
More QA in EOL than in release doesn't make sense. This 'anarchical'
approach is not very anarchical given what kind of changes are allowed.
--
Pat
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list