Status of libtool 2.2.X?
D. Hugh Redelmeier
hugh at mimosa.com
Mon Oct 13 05:26:20 UTC 2008
| From: Braden McDaniel <braden at endoframe.com>
| Yes, but the kind of patches that should be sent upstream are not the
| ones resulting in 300 busted packages from a libtool upgrade. We're
| talking about patches applied by a specfile build.
Could you characterize the problems that cause 300 busted packages?
Naive questions:
- Might a reasonable patch to libtool 2.2 fix a lot of these problems?
(And no, I don't mean "patch it back to 2.1.")
- Would it make sense to allow multiple versions of libtools co-exist
on a system and allow a .spec declaration of some kind specify which
to use?
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list