Package review backlog.

[Bill Nottingham]

Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora at leemhuis.info) said: 
> I propose that each FESCo member should try to work on at least one  
> package review per week. Each week at the FESCo meeting all FESCo  
> members should be asked what they did (as FESCo member) over the past  
> week to improve Fedora; they further should be asked what they (as FESCo  
> member) plan for the coming week to improve Fedora. That includes, but  
> is not limited to reviews.

This seems rather silly - do other elected bodies make each member
justify their existence once per week? (It's not like we're normally
hurting for things to talk about during meetings.)

CVS logs are public records. Bugzilla is a more-or-less public record.
Meeting logs are a public record. The information is there if people
want to use it for voter education purposes.

Bill