review-o-matic : Fedora package review helper
Patrice Dumas
pertusus at free.fr
Fri Oct 17 17:03:51 UTC 2008
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:27:35AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> It would be great if some effort could also be spent extending rpmlint
> itself to handle most of these things. Why implement a new tool when
> we have one already?
>
> Furthermore, since the Packaging Guidelines can change, it would help
> if they were versioned in some way so that rpmlint could refer to
> which version of the guidelines it is following.
Unless I am wrong, rpmlint is not a checked for fedora package
guidelines, it is distribution agnostic, simply a tool for checking
common errors in rpm packages.
--
Pat
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list