yafray "renamed" to yafaray - pick it ?

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:48 PM, KH KH <kwizart at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> 2008/10/13 Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> Hi!
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> As announced at http://www.yafray.org, yafaray replaces YafRay
>> >>> 0.0.9.
>> >>> >> Thus I'm thinking of submitting yafray as dead.package in Rawhide.
>> >>> (1)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On the other side, I'm not going to work on yafaray soon. So, if
>> >>> anyone
>> >>> >> wants to start working on it, feel free.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Nicolas (kwizart)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> (1), There is no reason why yafray should stop working with the
>> >>> current
>> >>> >> blender releases. But there might be a problem when theses two are
>> >>> >> installed together. (until now, blender either dlopen library or
>> >>> call
>> >>> >> binary, from yafray).
>> >>> >> This has to be discussed in the yafaray review. So, please cc'ed me
>> >>> on
>> >>> >> the review, along with your favorite reviewer. (or ask me as a
>> >>> reviewer).
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I may just do that.  One thing though, am I blind or is there nor
>> >>> yafaray
>> >>> > tarball, and I'll have to work from a svn checkout?  (bleah)
>> >>> Yes, that's right.
>> >>> I think it will be appropriate to use a script to create one source
>> >>> tarball.
>> >>> Good luck !
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> I can give you an .src.rpm that builds fine for F8, including the QT
>> >> interface.
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm<http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm>
>> >
>> > Thanks, I'll have a look, and see if I can rip-of^H^H^H^H^H^Hborrow from
>> > this to solve some of the issues I've run into so far.
>>
>> Hmm, on F-9:
>>
>> scons: done building targets.
>> + sed -i -es,/var/tmp/yafaray-0.1.0-buildroot,,g
>> /var/tmp/yafaray-0.1.0-buildroot/usr/lib/libyafaraycore.so
>> + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/limb/rpmbuild/BUILD/yafaray
>> extracting debug info from
>> /var/tmp/yafaray-0.1.0-buildroot/usr/lib/libyafarayqt.so
>> extracting debug info from
>> /var/tmp/yafaray-0.1.0-buildroot/usr/lib/libyafaraycore.so
>> Failed to write file: invalid section alignment
>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80705 (%install)
>>
>>
>>
> The problem is that  check-buildroot is
> accusing  "%{buildroot}"  in libyafaraycore.so
>
> I just erased the reference to %{buildroot} from the library to
> be able to get an rpm. F9 seems to have a more strict check.
>
> This was the only problem I got, and it needs a better solution.
>
>
>

Well, I fixed it:

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm

It builds just fine in F9 now.

I hope it can help you.

-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081018/54b24166/attachment.htm>