Blocker Bug Review Meeting :: Monday @ 14:00 UTC

[Michael H. Warfield]

	How do you add a bug to the blocker list?  The following two bugzilla
bugs are basically duplicates of each other and are a "failure to boot"
bug wrt mkinitrd:

	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466607
	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466071

	If I understand the blocker criterion here: 

	https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/ReleaseCriteria

Quote:

==
A note on MUST and SHOULD 
Items described with the word "MUST" are required to work for all
releases, including Test releases.
Additionally, the items described with the word "SHOULD" are required
for all final releases.
==

==
Boot 
      * The installed system MUST boot and start up properly.
==

	Those bugs are "failure to boot" which fails to meet the condition that
the install "MUST" boot.  There are several scenarios involving SCSI
drivers (and maybe one PATA) in both real and VMware environments which
fail this.

	The blocker document says: "Refer to the RoadMap for links to tracker
bugs and contact the ReleaseEngineering team if you wish to nominate any
bugs as blockers for a release that meet the following criteria."

	It doesn't say how to contact the ReleaseEngineering team or give an
E-Mail address and I would like to nominate these bugs.

	Mike


On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 19:18 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> A meeting is being held to review the current blocker bugs in 
> anticipation of the Final Development Freeze this Tuesday, October 28th.
> 
> All teams (thus the cc to f-a-b) in Fedora are welcome to join in and help.
> 
> WHEN: Monday, October 27, 2008 @ 14:00 UTC (10 AM EDT) and going as long 
> as we need to
> WHERE: irc.freenode.net #fedora-blocker
> 
> Fedora 10 Blocker: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=438943&hide_resolved=1
> Fedora 10 Preview Blocker: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=446449&hide_resolved=1
> 
> There still remain approximately 600 rawhide bugs that have not been 
> triaged for potential blocker status and should be considered as well. 
> These bugs are here: http://tinyurl.com/6llac8
> 
> Other tracker bugs of interest are here: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Trackers
> 
> John
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
> Fedora-devel-announce at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce
> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
-- 
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
   NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20081028/160719ea/attachment.sig>