Revert curl change made for flash
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
Mon Sep 1 23:30:08 UTC 2008
Michel Salim wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If there are legitimate reasons to have the older soname library in
>> Fedora, it should be done properly as a compat-curl package. That is
>> what I am going to press for in the FESCo meeting tomorrow.
>>
>> (There is also the possibility to have compat-curl done as a subpackage
>> of curl. That might be acceptable but we'll see how the discussion goes
>> tomorrow.)
>>
> Now that the change has been undone, what is the plan for providing
> libcurl.so.3? Apologies if this has been asked before, but searching
> the archives did not show anything. No bugzilla review request either.
>
> (if anyone is talking to Adobe requesting a recompile, then the need
> for a compat library is moot, naturally)
>
Adobe said their next build will use either libcurl.so.3 or
libcurl.so.4, whatever is available on the system. I suppose this means
wait until their next public build.
Warren
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list