Boot speedup with readahead

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Wednesday, 10 September 2008 at 20:42, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:24 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:16 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:14 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Seth Vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's a proof of concept plugin:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/post-transaction-actions/
> > > > 
> > > > Ok cool - with one small fix to the plugin, this simple action:
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thank you, I've applied this to the one I uploaded above.
> > > 
> > > So this seems to work - now the question is - should we push for this to
> > > go into rpm instead?
> > 
> > Absolutely.  If it's going to exist at all, it needs to be in rpm.
> > Otherwise this and the corresponding rpm changes fail the litmus test of
> > "will my system be the same if I download the rpm(2) and run the
> > transaction manually using rpm as it is if I use yum to install the
> > rpm".  Any time you fail that litmus test, you've put the code in the
> > wrong place (at least IMO).
> 
> unless we bite the bullet and stop falling back on being able to do
> everything from the rpm interface.

-1

Fedora doesn't need to go where Suse already is.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"