make force-tag gone

[Todd Zullinger]

Steve Grubb wrote:
> That is a horrible, UGLY kludge. I'm amazed that is our policy. It
> would have been far more helpful if someone who took away make
> force-tag would have made it echo a message to my screen saying that
> you need to do that.

I'm not arguing in favor of force-tag removal.  However, bumping the
release number like this is pretty much required if you have to
rebuild a package in an older branch, which can happen for various
reasons.  I don't see what's ugly or kludgy about ensuring that the
n-v-r remains less than what is in the devel branch.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Common sense is genius dressed in its working clothes.
    -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080914/a2c04bbb/attachment.sig>