consequences when a feature gets dropped (Re: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-09-17)
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Thu Sep 18 16:58:27 UTC 2008
On 18.09.2008 14:13, Josh Boyer wrote:
> == Summary ==
> === Features ===
> [...]
> As an added note, the following Feature pages have not been updated. They
> need to be updated before Beta or they will be dropped as Features:
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/BetterStartup
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EFI
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FirstAidKit
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GNOME2_24
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GoodHaskellSupport
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HDTVEnhancements
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KernelModesetting
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OnlineAccountsService
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.6
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SaveToBugzilla
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Sugar
> ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TimeZoneAndLocation
What exactly are the consequences if a Feature "will be dropped"? It
sounds a bit like a threat and as something bad. But is it really?
What for example will happen if the owners of the feature GNOME2_24
don't update the page. Will rawhide switch back to Gnome 2.22? Won't
Gnome 2.24 be mentioned at all in the release notes? Will it not get any
QA? Will we stick to Gnome 2.24 in F11? Will Spot send his nijas (¹)?
CU
knurd
(¹) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/Ninjas
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list