rawhide report: 20080829 changes

[Kevin Kofler]

Jindrich Novy <jnovy <at> redhat.com> writes:
> This could be the easiest way to go. Packager would then be responsible for
> differences if the content of noarch subpackage is dependent on
> builder arch and affects somehow binary package functionality or e.g.
> generated documentation.

And that isn't really different from what currently happens with pure noarch 
packages, which are just built on a random arch and it's the packager's 
responsibility to make sure they're really arch-independent.

        Kevin Kofler