Proposal: Split Fedora into sub-distributions

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Sun Sep 7 20:29:29 UTC 2008


On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 16:12 -0400, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote:
> Pavel Shevchuk wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Lyos Gemini Norezel
> > <lyos.gemininorezel at gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> Fedora-Development - Generic development platform
> >>     
> >
> > DVD has "Development" group with libs and headers and GCC and what not.
> >   
> 
> Sure... but why not have a distribution just for the developers?

And what is the software you develop going to test and run on? Are you
developing desktop applications, server/web applications, or both?

So the "developer" distribution is a superset of every other dist, which
means all sub-dists must not conflict and.... this whole idea is
completely senseless.

The raison d'être of a distribution is integration. Splitting it up runs
completely counter to this.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080907/ae14301d/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list