smolt-firstboot dependencies

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at redhat.com
Mon Sep 8 00:22:14 UTC 2008


On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs at math.uh.edu> wrote:
> >>>>>> "M" == Mark  <markg85 at gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > M> And all of that for just something you only see once.. Would be
> > M> best if smolt-firstboot just didn't have any dependency's or only
> > M> deps that are required by other must install (like python) apps as
> > M> well
> >
> > Well, it has to do things like talk over the web, so it's going to
> > need some RPC libraries of some type.  I think it is, however, obvious
> > that the current dependency chain is excessive.
> >
> > Checking the specfile, I see the python-turboflot dependency came in
> > with a change which was not changelogged (and did not include a
> > release bump), so there's no information about why that dep was
> > added.  The next package change was a license tag change, which
> > included a release bump and a build.  It is possible that something
> > snuck out which was not intentended.  I'm sure more will be known
> > tomorrow when those involved are back from the weekend.
> >
>
> Turboflot should only be necessary for the webapp server end.  It is
> not necessary for the client or firstboot.
>

This is now fixed.  I would like to ask, yet again, why something like
this was brought up on the list?  Someone could have contacted us directly
or even filed a bug.  Please think before posting to this list, its too
chatty as it is and is _NOT_ the correct place to go looking for actions
to be taken on specific packages and bugs that aren't philosophical in
nature.

	-Mike




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list