make force-tag gone
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Sep 9 17:39:34 UTC 2008
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 12:01 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
> force-tag can also be used to move the tag of a package that *was*
> built, if you're not careful. That's the situation we need to avoid.
> You can also view tagging as "I intend to build this". Why shouldn't
> we be able to track failed builds? It was submitted to Koji so even
> though it didn't result in a set of packages there was some effect on
> the system.
That brings up an important point. Often we'll want to examine why a
build failed and being able to get to the exact source of that build is
important, not whatever the maintainer thinks that tag should equate to
today.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080909/80d45968/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list