Pulseaudio : lots of issues, how can I help?
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Mon Sep 15 12:26:30 UTC 2008
Le Lun 15 septembre 2008 14:04, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski a écrit :
> On Monday, 15 September 2008 at 13:39, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> The console has not evolved for a long time, while text requirements
>> have gone up. At this point a dumbed down text-only X session is
>> probably the only credible console future (or something that is not
>> at all but uses many libraries we associate with apps now).
> Irrelevant. I'm not saying the text mode console has to have the
> same usability as a full-screen terminal emulator running on X.
That may be irrelevant for you but that's not irrelevant for me both
as a console user and as someone who is an upstream maintainer for my
language of some of the bits the console use.
The separation between the X text stack and the console text stack is
not worth the maintenance burden. As evidenced by the fact the
maintenance part of the console text stack (even as
iso-functionnality) is not done properly anymore.
>> Non-X-console state is so bad nowadays I don't bother reporting bugs
>> on it. Even if they are fixed they always reappear the next Fedora
>> cycle. There is simply not enough console users and console
>> developpers to do anything but life support anymore.
> I don't know of any bugs that prevent me or my colleagues from using
> the text mode console.
> That's not to say they don't exist, but I've
> never heard of any problems with the console either personally or from
> my colleagues.
So it works for you.
OSS works for some people too.
>> And that's ok. Do remember that X was defined at a time hardware was
>> vastly less powerful and core X is not wasteful at all. Compared to
>> how the rest of the system has bloated, X is definitely lean and
> That doesn't mean you have to disable the text mode console.
Do you volunteer for maintening all the stuff text mode console relies
on (fonts, layout definitions, etc)?
More information about the fedora-devel-list