consequences when a feature gets dropped (Re: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-09-17)

Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at
Thu Sep 18 18:04:03 UTC 2008


Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora <at> leemhuis.info> writes:
> and checked during QA, but don't have a Feature page (yet)? Take for 
> example KDE 4.1, which afaics has no Feature page (correct me if I'm 
> wrong, I could not find one), but at least should get mentioned in the 
> realease notes properly.

We don't consider KDE 4.1 a big enough change to deserve a full-blown feature 
page, also considering that most of it (everything except kdepim 4 and the KDE4 
libkipi framework in kdegraphics) also got pushed as an F9 update.

We will, however, make sure the release notes get updated for KDE 4.1 / F10, 
this was brought up on this week's KDE SIG meeting and jreznik volunteered. 
(I'll be helping him if needed. All the KDE release notes for F9 were written 
by me.)

        Kevin Kofler




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list