How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le lundi 22 septembre 2008 à 09:15 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 08:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le lundi 22 septembre 2008 à 07:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis a écrit :
> > > On 21.09.2008 23:33, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen <at> googlemail.com> writes:
> > > > [...]
> > > > IMHO, a much better approach would be to:
> > > > * throw out the hardcoded categories! We have that information in compsxml, 
> > > > PackageKit should not try to duplicate it.
> > 
> > The PK argument used to be comps groups suck, are distro-specific, have
> > no equivalent on some distros, so people should drop comps and
> > contribute to pk hardcoded stuff instead.
> 
> Where did you get that idea ? 

Already had many exchanges with Richard on the subject :)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080923/9ad8adb5/attachment.sig>