Mono-2.4 and ppc in rawhide

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 17:14:09 UTC 2009


Paul wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As it stands, the f11 release will not contain a ppc/ppc64 version of
> mono due to a continued build issue.
> 
As discussed earlier on this list, the worst that should happen is we
release with mono-2.4-9.RC1.fc11 which builds on ppc/ppc64.

> As a compromise, would it be acceptible to download the latest svn
> tarball, do a complete diff and patch in the diff file and then release
> it but not with the svn attribute? (assuming it will build on the ppc
> machines).
> 
> Failing that, should I just build mono from svn and check that in today
> as a chain build? Time is short - it's my birthday today, I've also got
> my kids for it (first time in 2 years), so a quick reply would help.
>
It sounds like mono's svn snapshot won't build on ppc any more than
current release + patches from the bug.  So taking a snapshot seems
unnecessary.

-Toshio



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090413/9a8cac61/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list