packages that have not yet rebuilt in dist-f11

[Seth Vidal]

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Panu Matilainen wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:08:11 +0200
>> Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
>> 
>>> Jesse Keating wrote:
>>>> Also, it means that not all of our package set has the
>>>> sha256 checksum, which is a checkbox item.
>>> 
>>> Speaking of that, can RPM itself be built with SHA256 now that F11
>>> Beta is out? IMHO it doesn't make sense to still support upgrades
>>> (directly) from F11 Alpha.
>> 
>> Yeah, I agree. Panu?
>
> Just did this for rawhide. Personally I couldn't care much less what digests 
> rpm package for a release X is using but if you want to break the freeze for 
> this then sure I can switch F11 rpm to default digests too.

unless there is a compellingly good reason to do it - I'd say keep it as 
it is, now. so that:

1. people could, conceivably go from not-quite-current F10 to F11GA

2. change == breakage as a general rule.

-sv