development packages and multilib

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Right, it absolutely would require you to setarch before launching a
> build for the 32-bit arch.  The question is why that's so unworkable.
> Especially when the present alternative just plain doesn't work.
> 
> I note that it's already expected by a lot of spec files (or at least
> by several of mine) that `uname -i` correctly reports the target arch.

I honestly don't know.  I don't see much wrong with it.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090422/33ca59c8/attachment.sig>