Use bash patchlevel as part of RPM version?

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Thu Apr 23 11:04:28 UTC 2009


On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:15:35PM -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 08:22 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > There is no difference to the kernel's diffs for version 2.6.29 to
> > 2.6.29.1 like `patch-2.6.29.1.bz2'.
> 
> .. Except for the fact the kernel patch has "2.6.29.1" right in its
> name. The kernel doing it like bash would look like:
> 
> kernel-2.6.29.tar.bz2
> patch-001.bz2

Not sure what you mean, the bash diffs are named like "bash40-017". It
does contain the major/minor/patchlevel versions (it lacks
conventional delimiters and a sane suffix like ".diff" or ".patch",
but that's due to the project's legacy).
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090423/5e0e0d2a/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list