development packages and multilib

Callum Lerwick seg at haxxed.com
Thu Apr 23 21:22:11 UTC 2009


On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > We rely on being able to build 32- and 64-bit binaries as part of the 
> > same build. How exactly is that supposed to work with mock?
> 
> I wonder how you get it to work now ... you must have a very short
> list of packages you depend on.

I've compiled the Second Life client this way. It has a hell of a
dependency list, and it works just fine.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090423/0a4879e7/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list