Request to become Provenpackager

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:20:57 +0300
Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 22:17 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:13:37PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > > Making corrections to the spec file doesn't mean building the new
> > > spec file, not to mention pushing the new build as an update.
> > > That should be left to the maintainer, if at all possible.
> > 
> > I think that you should only post patches, not commit to cvs,
> > unless the package maintainer agreed to.
> 
> Yes, this is of course the best option.
> 
> My only question is: what do we do about dead reviews?

Depends on what you mean by 'dead reviews'?

If you mean a review where the maintainer isn't responding, perhaps we
should look at following the unresponsive maintainer policy and/or
asking them directly if they would like to hand off maintainership to
someone else who has more time? 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090424/5a03fef4/attachment.sig>