Need advice pertaining to GSoC proposal

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 15:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ... and - most importantly - the fact that KPRs
> will only be available to Fedora maintainers, not to just about anyone
> who signs up for one ...

Actually, I think this premise is false. At one point someone was
discussing a koper-foo-release package per KoPeR. Although eventually
the EVR in updates should get high enough to bump the KoPeR-supplied
package out. And of course if/when the KoPeR gets torn down then the
release package becomes invalid.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090406/b5007220/attachment.sig>