rawhide report: 20090408 changes

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Apr 9 14:51:56 UTC 2009


On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 09:22 +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> 2009/4/9 Alex Lancaster <alexl at users.sourceforge.net>:
> > For example, when I looked at that e-mail I saw the keywords
> > "monodevelop", "blocking", "ppc" and assumed you were probably talking
> > about a single mono package, not the entire stack.  If I had realized
> > exactly what was being proposed, I'm sure I and others would have
> > spoken up.
> 
> So, concretely: should I or shouldn't I rebuild my failing
> mono-dependent package to ExcludeArch: ppc now in devel?

Please don't.  We should revert the mono build or get a fixed one
instead of churning all the mono dependent packages.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090409/167bac8f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list