What is up with glibc in rawhide?

[Tom Lane]

Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev at redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:44:45 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Would you consider reverting glibc to something older than -12?
>> Frankly, I don't trust anything that's been built since that went
>> into the buildroots, and the longer it's live the more likely we
>> are to regret it.

> I did not know that glibc was "broken" until you mentioned it.
> Everything works just fine... except Emacs apparently.

And mysql, and perhaps rpm according to Panu, and we know not what else
that has not got thorough regression tests executed as part of its build.

			regards, tom lane