rpms/proftpd/devel proftpd.spec,1.45,1.46

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Tue Apr 14 16:23:10 UTC 2009


Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
>> Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> writes:
>>> Matthias Saou wrote:
>>>> +# We'll need to find a better way to do this once RHEL6 comes out
>>
>>> A "better way" that I use is:
>>> BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h
>>> Works everywhere.
>>
>> I think this is discouraged by guidelines because it makes the depsolver
>> work *much* harder to figure out which package the require actually
>> resolves as.  At least I know I've been told to avoid it when practical.
>>
>> Of course, maybe fixing that is just a small performance fix in rpm ...
>>
> 
> It doesn't make the depsolver work harder. It makes the user/builder 
> download all the filelists metadata to do this look up - so it is a pain 
> for users on slow/bad connections.

It's not a problem in this case though because it's a buildreq that's 
resolved once on the buildsystem and has no impact on end users at all.

Paul.




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list