My first DontZap use case while testing F11 beta

[Ralf Corsepius]

Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Christopher Stone wrote:
>>> 2009/4/16 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>:
>>>> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 01:37 +0500, Suren Karapetyan wrote:
>>>>> You will not find anyone @RH who will agree that
>>>>> previews behavior was better
>>>>>
>>>> On the contrary, you'll likely find many people who work for Red Hat
>>>> that would prefer the old behavior, they're just not wasting their time
>>>> by arguing about it on a distribution mailing list.
>>> So what are they doing instead?
>> Abusing the Fedora as Guinea pigs, as they've done many times before.
> 
> By doing the change upstream?
>

When "upstreams" are identical to the fedora maintainers, the "upstream 
argument" is moot. They are in a position to commit any stupidity they 
want upstream and label it "upstream decsion".

If then, management and QA/control is dominated by "one governing state 
party" (Like in Fedora), all control and QA is effectively non-existent.

In other words, it's simply a matter of powers.