My first DontZap use case while testing F11 beta

[Mark]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:56:34AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> >On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> >>Abusing the Fedora as Guinea pigs, as they've done many times before.
>> >
>> >By doing the change upstream?
>> >
>>
>> When "upstreams" are identical to the fedora maintainers, the "upstream
>> argument" is moot. They are in a position to commit any stupidity they
>> want upstream and label it "upstream decsion".
>
> I think that basically all the Fedora X maintainers are upstream -
> however, not all of upstream are Fedora X maintainers.

Just one question.

How can fedora ever be objective about an issue like this if: (quote)
"all the Fedora X maintainers are upstream"

.... ? i'm interested in your reply on this one. (and a reply from all
RH/fedora ppl in this thread btw)