packages that have not yet rebuilt in dist-f11

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Apr 20 19:15:29 UTC 2009


On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 15:11 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:19 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't understand.
> >>
> >> oget (1):
> >>     zynjacku
> >>
> >> This new package was built 1 day before your email. Do I need to apply
> >> for a final freeze break? I don't care if the package goes directly to
> >> F-11 or to the updates.
> >
> > It should go somewhere, I suppose I'll have to try and modify the script
> > to look at pending updates, but those aren't guaranteed to go out, so
> > you could also just mentally filter it.
> >
> > This is the problem with taking so long to do your builds, the
> > constraints of the testing start to break down.
> >
> 
> Phew... I built the package 4 hours after cvs was done. Is that considered slow?
> 
> Orcan
> 
> ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990

I didn't mean you in particular, I meant that we're months from the
effort start and still having to track down undone builds.  This is
starting to conflict with folks like you bringing new packages in during
a freeze period.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090420/2d41770a/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list