packages that have not yet rebuilt in dist-f11

Orcan Ogetbil oget.fedora at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 19:29:52 UTC 2009


On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 15:11 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:19 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I don't understand.
>> >>
>> >> oget (1):
>> >>     zynjacku
>> >>
>> >> This new package was built 1 day before your email. Do I need to apply
>> >> for a final freeze break? I don't care if the package goes directly to
>> >> F-11 or to the updates.
>> >
>> > It should go somewhere, I suppose I'll have to try and modify the script
>> > to look at pending updates, but those aren't guaranteed to go out, so
>> > you could also just mentally filter it.
>> >
>> > This is the problem with taking so long to do your builds, the
>> > constraints of the testing start to break down.
>> >
>>
>> Phew... I built the package 4 hours after cvs was done. Is that considered slow?
>>
>> Orcan
>>
>> ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990
>
> I didn't mean you in particular, I meant that we're months from the
> effort start and still having to track down undone builds.  This is
> starting to conflict with folks like you bringing new packages in during
> a freeze period.
>
> --
> Jesse Keating

My intention, when I asked for cvs, was to have the package submitted
to F-11-updates, not to F-11 itself. The package got approved on the
17th. Should I have waited until F-11 is released to ask for cvs? I
want to learn this to do things the "proper" way next time.

Orcan




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list