packages that have not yet rebuilt in dist-f11

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Tue Apr 21 03:37:28 UTC 2009


On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:08:11 +0200
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:

> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Also, it means that not all of our package set has the
> > sha256 checksum, which is a checkbox item.
> 
> Speaking of that, can RPM itself be built with SHA256 now that F11
> Beta is out? IMHO it doesn't make sense to still support upgrades
> (directly) from F11 Alpha.

Yeah, I agree. Panu? 

> 
>         Kevin Kofler
> 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090420/49cc4f49/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list