[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Rawhide debuginfo packages with no sources

What steps are needed to get the package into the GA instead of as a
zero day update?


On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Debarshi Ray <debarshi ray gmail com> wrote:
>> but out of curiosity, what's the reason for
>> asking people to request F-11 freeze overrides for these fixes?
> Because without them the debuginfos are pretty useless. So if we don't
> override the freeze and release them as zero-day updates, then, as far
> as I understand, a user who wants to use the debuginfo will have to
> pull in the updated package and the updated debuginfo, instead of just
> the debuginfo.
> Other than that, the changes are pretty trivial. So why not get them
> in and have a polished F11 GA instead of burdening the average Joe
> user who likes to tell PK to "download all updates"? Not everyone has
> a nice broadband connection, you know. :-)
>>  If compiler
>> security features enabled by stuff in $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used it could be
>> argued to be a potential security issue, is that why?
> Yes, that is another reason, but to me having a polished GA looks more
> important.
> Happy hacking,
> Debarshi
> --
> One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an
> imaginary part.
>    -- Andrew Koenig
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]