Independent Fedora bug tracker
mcepl at redhat.com
Thu Apr 23 08:18:51 UTC 2009
On 2009-04-22, 16:07 GMT, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> Those are some really good points. In the "FOSS needs
> a central bugtracker" thread, there's an idea of issue trackers
> communicating with each other. Theoretically, this would
> alleviate some, if not all, of the work load of someone having
> to check two issue trackers, because if one can be consider
> upstream to the other, then the data can flow with the work
> only needing to be done in one place.
OK, either you are trolling or you are serious and you have some
brainpower to stand behind your words.
If the former, then read
carefully and then go and do something useful.
If the latter, then I have a couple of bugs for you to solve:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452962 -- that should
be easy, just make periodic XML-RPC requests and store it in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189813 -- OK, this is
biggie, and you will need to work closely with people around
http://www.bugzilla.org . On the other hand, I heard they work on
this, so any real help you can provide to them would be very
And fixing either of these would actually help somebody (me
included; yes, I would love to click on the button "Move
upstream" in RH Bugzilla) to fix bugs better. Your suggestion
(aside from making a lot of work for somebody else, not talking
about huge costs in hardware and bandwidth -- and yes, they are
huge, just believe me) doesn't seem to help to anybody.
More information about the fedora-devel-list