Independent Fedora bug tracker

[King InuYasha]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> writes:
> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:29 AM, King InuYasha <ngompa13 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> How had you not noticed how slow it is? For me, on average it takes
> >>> approximately 2.5sec to load a page. Red Hat Bugzilla takes
> approximately
> >>> 15-20sec to load a page.
> >
> >> I cannot replicate this on one machine so far, I'll be trying another.
> >
> > I think this squares with my theory up-thread that it's mostly a network
> > issue and not the database per se.  It would be interesting to compare
> > the ping times the two of you see to bugzilla.redhat.com.  For me the
> > ping time is around 120 msec and loading a single simple bug entry
> > takes about 3 seconds (on a good day, anyway ... it used to be a lot
> > worse ...)
>
>
> It could also just be a rendering speed of the browser. Really. As I
> said, a good thick client would solve most of the problems indicated
> in this thread.
>
>
> --
> Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
> ( www.pembo13.com )
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


Rendering speed of the browser? As if. I look at Bugzilla regularly in
various projects: Mozilla, ReactOS, Fedora, etc. and the Bugzilla is always
a bit slower than the rest of the site, true, but it is a lot more
pronounced on Red Hat's Bugzilla.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20090423/f09896b5/attachment.htm>