[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Independent Fedora bug tracker

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl redhat com> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton <pemboa gmail com> writes:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:29 AM, King InuYasha <ngompa13 gmail com> wrote:
>>> How had you not noticed how slow it is? For me, on average it takes
>>> approximately 2.5sec to load a page. Red Hat Bugzilla takes approximately
>>> 15-20sec to load a page.
>> I cannot replicate this on one machine so far, I'll be trying another.
> I think this squares with my theory up-thread that it's mostly a network
> issue and not the database per se.  It would be interesting to compare
> the ping times the two of you see to bugzilla.redhat.com.  For me the
> ping time is around 120 msec and loading a single simple bug entry
> takes about 3 seconds (on a good day, anyway ... it used to be a lot
> worse ...)

It could also just be a rendering speed of the browser. Really. As I
said, a good thick client would solve most of the problems indicated
in this thread.

Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )


Rendering speed of the browser? As if. I look at Bugzilla regularly in various projects: Mozilla, ReactOS, Fedora, etc. and the Bugzilla is always a bit slower than the rest of the site, true, but it is a lot more pronounced on Red Hat's Bugzilla.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]