2.6.29 kernel for f10

[M A Young]

On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Dennis J. wrote:

> That's really my point. 2.6.30 will be out soon so 2.6.29 will be outdated 
> again. What is the motivation of putting this much work into a kernel that 
> will be outdated when released and only have a shelf-life of 7 or 8 months. 
> Is there some critical feature in there that makes 2.6.29 so much better than 
> 2.6.27 to warrant this much effort for so little gain?

By that argument you would never update at all, because there will always 
be a new kernel coming along in a few months. There is also a cost to 
standing still, because things go out of date, and they would have to work 
to back-port patches for security fixes etc.

 	Michael Young