More Fedora mock breakage

[Tom Lane]

Bastien Nocera <bnocera at redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> [ consults CVS... ]  So XZ support in F-11's rpm is less than a week
>> old, there is *no* support in F-10, and we're already requiring
>> the capability in order to do useful development work?

>> All I can say is WTF.

> An rpm with Xz support is in F11 updates-testing. I'm pretty sure it's
> also in updates-testing for F10.

It is not in F-10's package CVS, let alone in updates-testing.  Yes,
I looked before complaining.  This was not well-managed.

			regards, tom lane