Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 13:39 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
> On 08/06/2009 12:32 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 08/06/2009 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>>> After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature
> >>>> owners, the following feature pages do not have a current status or their
> >>>> ability to tested during the Alpha is unclear based on the lack of
> >>>> information provided or percentage of completion.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraMoblin
> >>>
> >>> I'm the maintainer of this. I think its very much in a similar
> >>> category to gnome/kde. The only difference is there is some packages
> >>> still awaiting review, about 2 that are actually critical, but moblin
> >>> 2 like gnome etc are still in there development phase so its a moving
> >>> target.
> >> IMO, this feature should be scratched, because the packages in question
> >> are of immature nature (... and of low packaging quality from my POV).
> >
> > "Low packaging quality"? I certainly don't think so, given the amount of
> > time Peter spent on them, and the fact that they all seemed good enough
> > to pass review.
> Yes, they somehow sneeked through reviews. This doesn't invalidate what 
> I said.
> It only proves my impression of Fedora quality standards being low and 
> about the quality of reviews.

Would you please be so kind and name names here? What packages and what
reviews are you talking about? I asked you to write down the problems
you found in bz and CC me, but so far I haven't received a mail. Instead
you spend time on writing mails with abstract accusations to the list.

As you know I'm really interested in improving both the packaging and
the review quality and I appreciate your cooperation. Why not pick up
some of the reviews? This is the easiest and fastest way to enforce your
quality standards.

TIA,
Christoph